A Good Intro For Once
This isn't a traditional blog post. This is the introduction to a paper that I am writing for my Honors class. I'm choosing to share it here because I rarely write an introduction that I am proud of. Normally, I write my introductions at the end of the writing process, when I have finally figured out what I am trying to say. But this time, I was so excited to share my ideas that this intro just happened. I chose to write on Locke and Rousseau for this paper. I hope you enjoy this example of a paper introduction:
The way we view the things around us - ours, his, mine, hers, their - drastically impacts the way we live our lives. In the cultural west, we tend to stay in our own little corners. If we need or want something, we have to take action to get it, or at least make a case for why we should have it. If we have something that we don’t want, we give it to someone who offers us the most in return rather than the one who needs it the most. If we can get more than we need, we congratulate ourselves, and we strive to be like those who have the most. These are generalizations, yet they seem to hold true in more capitalist societies. Some of us thrive in the midst of capitalism, but some of us struggle to find a place in these environments. Why is there such a gap between the thrivers and the mere survivors? Arguably, because we don’t listen to John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although Locke and Rousseau disagree on the impact of private property on humankind, they both argue for enforced moderation of individual consumption for the purpose of relative equality and human flourishing.
The way we view the things around us - ours, his, mine, hers, their - drastically impacts the way we live our lives. In the cultural west, we tend to stay in our own little corners. If we need or want something, we have to take action to get it, or at least make a case for why we should have it. If we have something that we don’t want, we give it to someone who offers us the most in return rather than the one who needs it the most. If we can get more than we need, we congratulate ourselves, and we strive to be like those who have the most. These are generalizations, yet they seem to hold true in more capitalist societies. Some of us thrive in the midst of capitalism, but some of us struggle to find a place in these environments. Why is there such a gap between the thrivers and the mere survivors? Arguably, because we don’t listen to John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although Locke and Rousseau disagree on the impact of private property on humankind, they both argue for enforced moderation of individual consumption for the purpose of relative equality and human flourishing.
Comments
Post a Comment